DMD 2.100, bring ont he attribute soup

Fri May 27 07:06:08 UTC 2022

On Thursday, 26 May 2022 at 14:35:57 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> Fantastic. Every single one of them is a false positive so far. 
> I now face the situation where I will have deprecation warning 
> forever, or add attribute soup to the program.

Can you briefly highlight what those false positives are?

> I'd be happy to add attributes for something that could 
> actually track ownership/lifetime. DIP1000 is not that. Adding 
> attributes for that is not worth it.

Would having attributes be inferred for non-templated functions 
alleviate some these problems? Or isn't that possible because a 
definition might have forward declarations with qualifiers 
needing to be in sync with the definition?