Why is D unpopular, redux.

[zjh]

On Friday, 27 May 2022 at 09:37:25 UTC, zjh wrote:
I hope that the `d` language can better link to my
> previous `C++ library`.

I also hope that d can have `...` operator.
It turns out that `'manu'` has a `'dip'`, which is obviously a 
good thing. Why not add it?
`D` need to learn `'c++''s success`.Add when you should.As long 
as `no use, no cost`. Then who cares.
As for `d's` becoming `complex` , which successful language is 
`not complex` in the end?
I just hope that I can configure like `'vim'`,`Everything is 
configurable`.