Why is D unpopular, redux.

[deadalnix]

On Friday, 27 May 2022 at 10:07:53 UTC, zjh wrote:
> On Friday, 27 May 2022 at 09:37:25 UTC, zjh wrote:
> I hope that the `d` language can better link to my
>> previous `C++ library`.
>
> I also hope that d can have `...` operator.
> It turns out that `'manu'` has a `'dip'`, which is obviously a 
> good thing. Why not add it?
> `D` need to learn `'c++''s success`.Add when you should.As long 
> as `no use, no cost`. Then who cares.
> As for `d's` becoming `complex` , which successful language is 
> `not complex` in the end?
> I just hope that I can configure like `'vim'`,`Everything is 
> configurable`.

Stop adding new crap int he language, unless it fixes existing 
crap. Once the existing crap is in decent shape, we'll think 
about `...`. Endless pursuing the next shinny object- is how we 
got where we are.

Even in this thread, this keeps happening. It's like an addition.