Idea: Ownership & lifetime escape analysis by variables in reference to

[rikki cattermole]

On 29/05/2022 8:50 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 08:14:18 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
>> I'm not concerned too much about preciseness as long as the false 
>> positives are low (or at least lower than DIP1000).
> 
> It cannot both be simple and low on false positives. Anyway, I dont 
> really like the concept of DIP1000.
> 
> It basically means that any required change to a function can lead to a 
> situation where one has to slap @trusted on it.

That's how this originally came up on Discord.

I dislike DIP1000 too. We need to go back to the drawing board it isn't 
archiving what it should be.