Discussion Thread: DIP 1044--Enum Type Inference--Community Review Round 1
Timon Gehr
timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Sat Nov 19 12:22:53 UTC 2022
On 11/19/22 05:22, Walter Bright wrote:
> Consider this:
>
> enum A { a; }
> enum B { a; }
>
> void f(A);
> void f(B);
>
> ...
> f($a + $a); // mentioned in the DIP as allowed
> ...
>
> Since the DIP allows expressions containing such enum inferences, it
> looks like we are faced with the possibility of having to re-run the
> semantic pass for enum arguments for every enum overload.
Only if the new feature is actually used, and yes, this is the same as
for function literals. I guess the implementation can be optimized
further for enum arguments, but I doubt it would make a meaningful
difference.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list