What is the better signature for this?
Guillaume Piolat
first.last at spam.org
Sun Oct 9 20:00:01 UTC 2022
On Sunday, 9 October 2022 at 19:44:13 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
>
> What about `float[4]` then? We can get back `@trusted`.
>
>
> __m256i _mm256_loadu_si256 (const(float[4])* mem_addr)
> pure @trusted; // (C)
>
>
> Then, we loose compatibility ith intrinsics code originally
> written in C++. Casting to `const(float[4])*` is even more
> annoying to type than casting to `const(__m256i)*`.
>
Erratum: it is `long[4]`, not `float[4]`
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list