DIP1000 scope inference
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Wed Oct 26 08:03:37 UTC 2022
On 10/24/2022 6:35 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> In a `@trusted` function today, without dip1000, the above is perfectly
> reasonable and not invalid. Will dip1000 make it corrupt memory?
A very good question. Clearly, having code work when it is @safe, but cause
memory corruption when it is marked @trusted, is the wrong solution. This should
never happen. I'm not sure what the solution should be here.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list