C++ pattern matching is coming
German Diago
germandiago at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 10:53:50 UTC 2022
On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 06:28:37 UTC, Arun wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 01:06:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli
> wrote:
>> On 10/25/22 17:53, zjh wrote:
>
>> I am saying the above with full understanding that there are
>> programmers out there who were educated in C++ circles and are
>> sure that garbage collectors are for inferior languages. That
>> is a shortcoming of their education.
>
> For short running tools and low volume stuff, yes, GC is good.
>
> My practical experience running vibe.d service with GC in
> production: default GC is a bane. Default should've been @nogc.
I would like to hear your experience with Vibe.d. I would care
about performance scaling. I have been genuinely interested in
using it for years but I did not dare to jump into it. As opposed
to Django.
But my intuition tells me that sooner or later Django backends
for small things like what I do will be a resource hog compared
to D? True that I can partition, do microservices, etc. but that
complicates things. On the positive Python side, there is no
compilation step and that helps a lot in many situations.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list