'goto', as an indicator of good language

[Dukc]

On Thursday, 8 September 2022 at 21:03:04 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> The `goto` of today's languages is a much safer, de-fanged 
> version of the original goto. In D, for example, you cannot 
> `goto` out of a function (or into another). The compiler also 
> doesn't let you skip variable initializations / destructions. 
> So it's subject to pretty much the same constraints as 
> "structured" constructs like if, while, for, switch, etc., 
> except it's more low-level and can do a few more things that 
> the other constructs can't do.

Well if I really wanted to I could do it in 60s style by putting 
everything inside a giant `switch(callStack.pop)` in `main()`. 
"functions" would be just `goto` labels, called like this:

```D
callStack.push(something);
goto function;
case something:
```

...with a jump to the switch at end of each "function" body.

So `goto` does technically have as long fangs as always :D. Of 
course, modern languages do a good job encouraging better coding 
habits.