Regarding the proposed Binray Literals Deprecation
mw
mingwu at gmail.com
Sat Sep 10 20:12:05 UTC 2022
On Saturday, 10 September 2022 at 19:56:14 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
> On 9/10/2022 11:44 AM, mw wrote:
>> Second, why not provide the above "trivial parser" into std
>> lib (so nobody need to reinvent the wheel)
>
> Indeed, why not! Want to give it a go?
Not me.
I'm fine with: (e.g. uint32)
0b0000_0110_0110_0110_0110_0110_0110_0110
I don't see any advantage of:
"...._.XX._.XX._.XX._.XX._.XX._.XX._.XX.”
over the binary literals, and it worth the effort.
And I don't think the latter is more readable than the former.
What I'm saying is that: if you insist on removing binary (I hope
you not), then [why not provide ...] the migration tool.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list