Poll: do you use @property semantics?

[rikki cattermole]

On 15/09/2022 1:31 PM, Ruby The Roobster wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 September 2022 at 00:38:54 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
>>
>> On 15/09/2022 12:34 PM, Ruby The Roobster wrote:
>>> I use it (though in my case, the code would still work the same even 
>>> without @property).
>>
>> Okay, so you don't use the semantics provided by @property, a UDA 
>> would still allow your code to work (see link for semantics)?
> 
> I mean that because properties don't take any arguments, such a function 
> could be called using UFCS, and it would act the same as if it were 
> marked @property.

Okay good good, you are only using the syntax that is what we needed to 
know, thanks!