Cppfront : A new syntax for C++

[Dukc]

On Monday, 19 September 2022 at 08:59:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 9/18/2022 1:47 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
>> Eventually using unsafe languages will require clearance from 
>> a cyber security government agency.
>
> This trend is why D is steadily moving towards 100% memory 
> safety.

Modulo bugs and undefined behaviour on assert failure with 
`-release`, We already have it with `-preview=dip1000` turned on. 
I think.

I think you mean memory safe RAII and reference counting. DIP1000 
enables limited forms of those, but in practice one still tends 
to be stuck mostly with the GC, static memory and the stack.