Monorepo?
Mathias LANG
geod24 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 16:48:51 UTC 2023
On Monday, 6 February 2023 at 10:22:32 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> Now that dmd/druntime is in one repo, is there a good reason to
> not include Phobos?
Because it will inevitably lead to circular dependencies,
something Walter is already complaining about.
There was an advantage in merging DMD and druntime: They are
tightly coupled, and we often enough situations where you had to
merge a PR in one repo to see if things were working in the
other. We don't have that requirement in Phobos.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list