Monorepo?

Mathias LANG geod24 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 16:48:51 UTC 2023


On Monday, 6 February 2023 at 10:22:32 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> Now that dmd/druntime is in one repo, is there a good reason to 
> not include Phobos?

Because it will inevitably lead to circular dependencies, 
something Walter is already complaining about.

There was an advantage in merging DMD and druntime: They are 
tightly coupled, and we often enough situations where you had to 
merge a PR in one repo to see if things were working in the 
other. We don't have that requirement in Phobos.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list