Windows experience is atrocious

[Paolo Invernizzi]

On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 14:43:20 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:

> And chances are *really* good that `in` means `ref` anyway. 
> Cases where `in` might not use `ref` are something like `int`, 
> or `byte`. Are there good use cases for accepting integers via 
> const reference?
>
> -Steve

And if you really want to be explicit, can't you just avoid 'in' 
and go for the ref / const / scope / etc low-level specification?

(caveat, I admit sometime to be lost in all that specs ... 
dip1000 + @live destroyed a lot of my neurones)