D has become unbearable and it needs to stop

[Mike Parker]

On Saturday, 10 June 2023 at 08:58:34 UTC, GrimMaple wrote:

> Long story short, what is there to discuss, if a simple 
> question like "What are the requirments for the D team to 
> consider LTS branch/release" is hanging unanswered? I don't 
> believe that discussing such a thing is worth my (or anyone 
> else's) time just because nobody cares enough to give straight 
> answers. Without resorting to [please forgive my momentary 
> rudeness] idiotic suggestions to come to some arbitrary meeting 
> to discuss essentially nothing.
>
> I am willing to come to the meeting, fine, but only after some 
> common ground is found on topics of:
> 1. Needing LTS in the first place
> 2. Requirments and prerequisites for such an event
> 3. Your (D team's) proposition on how such thing could be 
> achieved, and what resources are necessary for it
>
> So far I only saw endless debates on wether LTS is even needed, 
> and some abstract talk about "gib monez" without any concrete 
> propositions.
>
> Otherwise, this is a waste of everyone's time.

You're the one pushing for an LTS release. If you have a case to 
make for it, then you're welcome to come to the meeting and 
discuss it. I can't speak for everyone on the team. You might 
find support, you might not. The invitation's there, without any 
preconditions. Take it or leave it.