OT: if you have money in a Western Bank...
Laeeth Isharc
laeeth at laeeth.com
Sat Mar 25 21:07:35 UTC 2023
Hi.
Sorry for the offtopic post, but I figure in the context it's
better to risk annoying some people than regretting that I didn't
say something when it might have helped.
You've probably heard about the difficulties with Silicon Valley
Bank, regional US banks and then Credit Suisse.
I think there's still too much of a focus on the direct effect of
rising rates on the assets held by banks.
When the central banks drive interest rates too low then
investors become desperate for yield and they persuade themselves
that it's okay to take what seems like just a bit more risk it it
will get them the return they need. It's not like an investor
working for a conventional institution has a choice because you
can take reckless amounts of risk for years and not get into
trouble and after a while you just look like a fuddy duddy
conservative guy who is out of touch with the times and at best
you will get sidelined. I've seen this in the early 90s, in the
tech wreck post 2000, in the credit bubble going into 2007 and
again in recent years.
Cycles alternate, perhaps because memories are short but not that
short and people obsess with avoiding a repeat of the mistakes
that led to the last episode, completely ignoring the new risks
that will cause problems in the next downturn.
So last time the problem was with residential real estate and I
guess this time it will be in commercial real estate, maybe
private equity and private funding of companies too.
There are two factors that go into the valuation of an asset -
the discount/interest rate and the future cashflows (about which
there's always a degree of uncertainty).
Commercial real estate means offices, shopping centres, storage
and the like. Landlords buy a building, borrow most of the cost
locking in terms (including the cost of borrowing) for a few
years and then they sign leases for a few years. When the loan
reaches maturity they need to refinance at prevailing rates and
hopefully rents still cover the cost of financing if the latter
has gone up and hopefully rents didn't go down and hopefully you
can find new tenants to replace those that leave.
If on the other hand you can't cover the costs of the loan with
rents then maybe you can work out something with the bank, but if
not then you give the keys back to the bank (maybe your vehicle
goes bust in the process) and now the bank owns the property and
it can sell it for what it will fetch when it can find a buyer.
Because there's a cycle in lending and building there's not an
even distribution through time of loans coming due. Lots of
loans come due from 2023 for a few years and rates will be
considerably higher because risk free rates rose a lot and the
spread of the commercial lending rate over risk free rates also
widened.
So the discount rate isn't looking good for valuations.
Unfortunately neither are rental prospects. Many buildings are
now half empty at best thanks to hybrid and remote working (and
companies are going to start hiring remote more because access to
talent is better that way - like I told my institutionally minded
colleagues a few years back, no Goldman don't do what I am doing
but I think they will be copying me in a few years).
Corporate tenants can't just get out of their leases because they
don't want them anymore. I mean you can negotiate hardball -
stop paying like Twitter did and force a conversation (and in
future there will be many such cases). But ultimately it's a
contract to which you are bound. You can sublet space and that
will drive down the spot market for rents and as old leases come
to expiry you can get out of your space that you no longer need.
All this is happening when there's been a decline in quality of
life in big cities but it hasn't really hit hard yet. I think it
will continue and it will hit hard soon enough.
So I think there are going to be major problems in commercial
real estate in the US and Europe and maybe elsewhere. There was
a report from the European regulator on commercial real estate
lending practices and reading better the lines of a carefully
written report it made lenders seem like a bunch of buffoons who
had abandoned the most basic disciplines of the field.
It's more than just that though - some of the banks most exposed
to commercial real estate are critical in providing liquidity to
the bond repo market and the repo market is the lifeblood of
modern finance. If that seizes up there will be very big
problems and even behemoths like JP Morgan may have some
difficulties.
Mostly in 2008 nobody lost money in the banks that defaulted and
people sort of assume that will be the case this time around.
Unfortunately the authorities changed their approach. Their
bluff will be called and what happens is uncertain but their
intended policy is that deposits exceeding the insurance
threshold won't be protected by that amount. It's about 85k per
institution per person in the UK. That's not much for a business
especially that has people to pay and the like.
Under conditions of uncertainty sometimes it's more about f(x)
than x. In other words maybe it's very unlikely that you lose
money held as a bank deposit or maybe it's quite likely. That
doesn't make much difference to the right action because the
consequences dominate the exact probability (which of course can
never be known).
If you have money above the insured maximum in a bank then you
might want to think about that. In the US you can put money with
Treasury Direct in bills or short dated bonds (they might be late
in paying if there's a technical default over the debt ceiling
but I think they will be money good in the end). In the UK you
can open up a national savings and investment account.
A business can open up an investment account and in dollars buy T
bills, SHY ETF or in gbp buy gilts or in euros buy German paper.
I'd avoid Schwab and keep an eye on the health of my brokerage.
Some people might want to own some precious metals. You can buy
a physical ETF (platinum and silver are more volatile but cheaper
than gold) or for larger sums buy precious metals and keep them
in a vault.
Longer term the risk is inflation but right now I think the risk
to having too high a bank balance isn't justified by the meager
rewards.
Might be worth gently mentioning to friends and family too.
You know longer term we don't need banks - fractional reserve
banking has truly become a vampire squid. You just need
somewhere safe to make payments - and you already have services
that do this, that don't speculate with your money - and there
needs to be a way for lending to happen. Large institutions like
Black Rock already do lending and we don't need banks for this.
European Banks are like 16x levered before derivatives. That
doesn't take much of a downturn at all to completely wipe out
their capital base.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list