Future of D
Guillaume Piolat
first.name at gmail.com
Mon Oct 30 15:56:41 UTC 2023
On Monday, 30 October 2023 at 14:30:25 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
>
> Do you have an explaination to why the number of contributions
> to phobos has decreased so much since about 2018-2019?
A combination of:
- std.experimental.allocator and std.experimental.logger faced
increasing scrutiny, it took a long-time and ended up underused
anyway.
- Phobos being well used and mature, with very-high quality stuff
that is hard to produce.
- disinterest for Phobos additions (driven by "no way to remove
stuff") versus the reactivity in DUB, where API can evolve more
easily
- also being somewhat not possible to use in all cases (-betterC,
alt. runtimes)
Personally I think the STL Stepanov-style is a dead end and we
were oversold composable algorithms, that fail to create
understandability.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list