Blazingly 🔥 fast 🚀 memory vulnerabilities, written in 100% safe Rust. 🦀
Bastiaan Veelo
Bastiaan at Veelo.net
Mon Apr 1 14:11:58 UTC 2024
On Saturday, 30 March 2024 at 14:25:42 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> Certainly it's unfortunate for Rust that this bug exists, but I
> don't think it makes sense to pass judgement on the overall
> design of Rust's lifetime system based on the existence of an
> implementation bug.
In absence of a language specification, it is hard to judge
whether a flaw is an implementation bug or not. The Hacker News
thread that I linked to has an endless discussion on whether this
one is more fundamental. The problem has been known for nine
years.
> If we were to hold D to the same standard, I do not think it
> would compare favorably.
You may be right.
— Bastiaan.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list