Garbage Collection for Systems Programmers
Adam Wilson
flyboynw at gmail.com
Sat Apr 6 00:06:04 UTC 2024
On Friday, 5 April 2024 at 16:40:06 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
> *There is a massive strategic win to having a fabulous 21st
> century GC for D, perfectly good for soft-real-time coding with
> no further ado, like the one used by the author of the article
> linked at the start of this thread.*
This is the point I was trying to make. The strategic win for
have a fantastic GC would be immense, and would far outweigh
anything we could gain by continuing down the no-GC path. But
first I would like to state that I am *not* advocating that D
remove any of the existing no-GC support. Even I use it
occasionally!
But I was there when the anti-GC crowd put on a full court press
to convince the community that all we needed to do to see massive
increase in adoption was make the language more accessible to
C/C++ users who need to manually manage memory. As a result,
tools like `@nogc` and `-betterC` were introduced. When that
proved insufficient, the anti-GC crowd started demanding more
invasive changes, up to and including removing the GC altogether.
Instead, the world changed around us. Memory Safety is now a
national security concern and languages like C/C++ are being
slowly replaced in favor of Rust/Go/C#/Java. These languages
speak to the most common usages and concerns of the users of
programming languages, and those usages/concerns largely do not
benefit from no-GC.
Chasing no-GC as far as we did was a mistake that cost us
precious time and scarce resources. We need to be mature enough
to admit that it was a mistake and correct our course. Given the
lessons and direction of the industry over the intervening years,
I would strongly argue that now is the time to return our focus
to the GC.
> Imagine this: what if D had such an ace GC for the last decade?
> Perception and use of D would be entirely different to its
> present state; soft-real-time applications would abound, with a
> wide community of pro-D game programmers talking in the forums.
>
> Just like ImportC being a game changer, ace GC is a game(!)
> changer. It's just harder to see this, but it is so.
Mic. Drop.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list