Outer class reference oddity?

[Walter Bright]

The reason the inner class feature exists is to support translation from Java 
code which used inner classes. (It doesn't exist in C++.)

Ok, so there is only one outer. This illustrates how confusing this example is 
(at least to me!)


 > it is typed as the base type, and not as the derived type which was assigned 
on creation.

It is indeed typed as the static type, not the dynamic type.

I encourage you to submit it to bugzilla.

I suggest just adding the Outer2 qualification, and move on. Or use an alternate 
method such as interfaces or aggregation.