Tell us your DIP1000 woes

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Mon Aug 26 18:54:26 UTC 2024


On 8/26/2024 1:33 AM, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> This appears to be an interaction between DIP1000 and the fact that ``@trusted`` 
> functions have an interface that is required to be ``@safe`` but not its body 
> validated.

It not only appears to be, it is true that trusted functions are not validated.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list