Tell us your DIP1000 woes

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 29/08/2024 8:53 PM, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> Thing is, this signature just says the parameter contributes towards the 
> return, it doesn't consume and invalidate the original input variable.

To clarify, "invalidate the original input variable" means that from the 
caller function, after the function call the argument variables will no 
longer be the values that the compiler will be expecting. Potentially 
causing memory corruption that would otherwise have been caught.