D not considered memory safe
Lance Bachmeier
no at spam.net
Sat Jul 6 23:17:00 UTC 2024
On Saturday, 6 July 2024 at 23:10:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 7/6/2024 4:07 AM, Sebastian Nibisz wrote:
>> Seriously? Any language is safe in this case, you just need to
>> write safe code.
>
> Enabling the checks is quite different from writing code with
> no bugs in it.
Correct. If `@safe:` is too much to add to the program, then how
do you know `@trusted:` didn't slip in somewhere? You'd have to
remove the possibility of writing unsafe code if those are the
constraints.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list