DIP 1040
Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole
richard at cattermole.co.nz
Sat Jul 13 06:36:39 UTC 2024
On 13/07/2024 7:46 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1040.md
>
> We're going to get back on it.
We did some reading and reviewing of it last night.
Some observations:
1. It could be simplified greatly if we had type state analysis (blit
init over it and be done with it).
2. Its acting in the form of an optimization, rather than trying to be
100% moves only feature.
3. Isolated ala Midori could be used instead, and that buys us ownership
transfer for temporal safety.
4. The move constructor isn't great, it is too easily confused. It is
closely related to ``opAssign`` so ``opMove`` or ``opAssignMove`` might
be better candidates.
5. To make it move only, you can write and then disable the copy
constructor (would need documenting).
6. While it can work, the general consensus seems to be the tunings of
the design has some ways to go still.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list