[Not really OT] Crowdstrike Analysis: It was a NULL pointer from the memory unsafe C++ language.

[aberba]

On Sunday, 21 July 2024 at 17:45:26 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew 
Cattermole wrote:
> On 22/07/2024 5:42 AM, aberba wrote:
>> On Sunday, 21 July 2024 at 17:39:23 UTC, Richard (Rikki) 
>> Andrew Cattermole wrote:
>>> [...]
>> 
>> @live?
>
> Within a function body that provides spatial memory lifetime 
> guarantees.
>
> That is the easy part, its inter-function which is the hard 
> part and it does not attempt to solve that.
>
> I.e. storing a pointer into some objects and knowing that you 
> have the only access to it, and if you extract it you have the 
> only value of it.

Why isn't that the goal instead of just what @live is proposing?