[Not really OT] Crowdstrike Analysis: It was a NULL pointer from the memory unsafe C++ language.

Paolo Invernizzi paolo.invernizzi at gmail.com
Fri Jul 26 08:43:19 UTC 2024


On Thursday, 25 July 2024 at 19:36:13 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:

> I am taking issue with throwing overboard even the aspiration 
> of memory safety. You won't get D widely recognized as a safer 
> language if its ecosystem is actively encouraged to build on 
> careless `@trusted` slapping-on, even on functions where it is 
> completely obvious that they have an unsafe interface.

This!


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list