[Not really OT] Crowdstrike Analysis: It was a NULL pointer from the memory unsafe C++ language.

[aberba]

On Monday, 29 July 2024 at 05:30:51 UTC, aberba wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 July 2024 at 14:35:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> [...]
>
> I don't disagree I do have some catching up to do. Also found 
> this write-up from 2yrs ago 
> (https://github.com/dlang/vision-document) and I've not been 
> using D much since 3-4yrs ago besides some few hobby projects 
> and popping up here recently.
>
> I wish this document was referenced whenever such discussions 
> come (assuming it's still relevant).
>
>
> This back-and-forth about the action plan to move to @safe by 
> default (if it's even going to happen) isn't encouraging... I 
> don't mind the debates, but this doing seem to be yield a 
> resolution. Maybe you guys should meetup and hash things out.
>
> We the regular users are the ones supposed to be pushing back, 
> not the top contributors (core members??).

*I meant doesn't seem to be yielding any results/resolution to 
the direction to getting D to @safe by default considering that 
is/was the vision