[Not really OT] Crowdstrike Analysis: It was a NULL pointer from the memory unsafe C++ language.

[Paolo Invernizzi]

On Monday, 29 July 2024 at 09:20:05 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
> On Monday, 29 July 2024 at 08:13:22 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
>>
>> There's no two semantic meaning of @trusted, there's only one: 
>> the interface MUST be safe.
>> If  @trusted trusted is abused for another semantic, then D 
>> should introduce something explicit for that other semantic, 
>> not poison @trusted.
>>
>> /P
>
> It is already used that way

I know, the problem is not that's already used in that way, the 
problem is that the language deus ex-machina is actively pushing 
for that.

And I think it's the final nail in the coffin for D memory safe 
credibility.