The Future of D Runtime

[Atila Neves]

On Tuesday, 18 June 2024 at 06:12:53 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Monday, 17 June 2024 at 22:58:13 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>> On Thursday, 6 June 2024 at 18:00:56 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think DRT only needs to concern itself with supporting 
>>> language features. Anything else needs to go elsewhere.
>>
>> Same here, and that it should be pay-as-you-go and as small as 
>> possible. Anything else should be regular D code.
>
> Ok, then were does the Event Loop go?

What event loop? Unless we add a language feature for this I 
don't see why it would belong in drt.

> Or the `std.math` methods that the compiler hooks?

Intrinsics?

> The basic problem with the premise is that you're effectively 
> saying "we're never going to do more than DRT does today".

Not in drt itself, no. But why would we have to?