Google's take on memory safety
Dom DiSc
dominikus at scherkl.de
Thu Mar 7 10:40:21 UTC 2024
On Thursday, 7 March 2024 at 08:12:36 UTC, aberba wrote:
> Also depending on the task, the results can be better. For
> example it appears natural language processing has progressed
> better than other AI tasks/fields.
That's only because for natural language there is better training
data, because humans are good at natural language. (Still AI is
not as good at it as humans, only not so bad anymore that one
shruggs in disapointment).
But in programming languages humans are not as good, so the
training data also is not. I have no high hopes in using such an
AI.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list