Google's take on memory safety

[Dodobird]

On Monday, 18 March 2024 at 00:43:37 UTC, Dodobird wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 March 2024 at 10:46:48 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 6 March 2024 at 09:42:22 UTC, Sergey wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 6 March 2024 at 09:19:20 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
>>>
>>>> We see no realistic path for an evolution of C++
>>>
>>> So the future of humanity is with JVM/Swift/Go/Rust?
>>
>> Well, it might be D if we are able to convince people.
>
> You don't need to convince people.  The proof is in the 
> pudding. Instead, a reddit explains much of this 
> ------------------------------- title:   Why is D unpopular?  
> https://www.reddit.com/r/d_language/comments/q74bzr/why_is_d_unpopular/
>
> reply to first comment by
> koczurekk
> •
> 2y ago :
> randomguy4q5b3ty
> •
> 4mo ago   In that sense, I have always felt that D's features 
> are just too general for their own good.
>
> -------------------------
> So, D is missing the KISS principle, Keep It Simple, Stupid!  
> Do one thing and one thing well. Trying to be jack of all 
> trades will make an expert in none.
>
> So! Where does D have unmet potential to shine, and a 
> pre-emptive strike against the rise of rivals, including Rust, 
> and zombie language Java?
>
> My answer:  Industrial Robotics
>
> If we can get a core rock solid industrial robotics set of 
> libraries, D will sell itself.  And the C, C++, Java/C++ and 
> endless variants of C#, Objective C, this entire family of C 
> descendants -- can move for 1 thing and 1 thing well, to D.
>
> Is D Lang willing to take on such a task?  Why or why not. What 
> would need to happen for this?

from linkedIn post: ...Context is King Kong, and Consistency is 
King Kong's MOTHER!

https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C4D12AQH_t0Tkls1dAg/article-inline_image-shrink_400_744/0/1597073878308?e=1715817600&v=beta&t=iaTKFdJ7itHmP1MxUlwxgxjD2jCiquHbkIKY11I39Mc

(focus daniel-san image)

from: 
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/anatomy-linkedin-post-jeff-young