Why isn’t 2.110 published?
Don Allen
donaldcallen at gmail.com
Mon Nov 4 17:14:53 UTC 2024
On Friday, 25 October 2024 at 12:59:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 25 October 2024 at 12:48:02 UTC, Lance Bachmeier
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> That's not the problem. A delay of three months (or however
>> long it turns out to be) with no communication is not
>> something you see when an open source project is healthy. It's
>> a sign that all the contributors are focused on doing their
>> own thing. Which of course they have a right to do, but then
>> new users/adoption dries up. This combined with the death of
>> GtkD and Visual D, and what appears to be a lack of new users,
>> particularly business users, does not make a compelling case
>> when comparing with other languages.
>
> One of Iain's goals is to get the release progress packaged up
> into basically a single button push so that anyone can do it.
> Once he gets to that point, we'll be able to avoid situations
> like this. But we aren't there yet. Until we are, it's pretty
> much on his shoulders.
It is amazing to me when I read, repeatedly
Q: Why has there been no communication about the delay of the
2.110 release?
A: Iain is busy. That's why 2.110 hasn't been released.
It is not helpful to this project when people ask a question and
receive an answer to a question they didn't ask.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list