Proposal: Enhancing unittest with Inline Module-Level Statements

[Sharif yt]

Hello D enthusiasts,

One of D's standout features is its built-in unittest, which 
makes writing and maintaining test cases seamless and integrated. 
However, while working with the current unittest block structure, 
I’ve been experimenting with a more concise module-level 
statement for simpler assertions.

Inspired by an idea I came across (and expanded upon), this 
approach allows inline assertions using unittest() with 
parentheses instead of braces {}. Here’s an example:

d
Copy code
unittest(1 == 1);
unittest(1 == 1, "Math broke");
Why Consider This?
Simplicity: For single assertions, it reduces boilerplate while 
still maintaining clarity.
Optional Messages: Helps document why the assertion exists 
without cluttering the code.
Integration 
https://menuland.ph/contis-cake-delivery-menu-in-philippines/ 
with Existing Framework: This would complement, not replace, the 
current unittest block style.
Potential Benefits
Makes quick checks in small modules or scripts easier.
Encourages  more frequent, lightweight assertions, especially for 
debugging.
Possible Challenges
Parsing implications—ensuring it works well alongside the 
existing block-based structure.
Balancing clarity in larger modules where inline and block styles 
might mix.
What do you think about extending D's unittest capabilities in 
this way? Could it make testing in D even more accessible and 
enjoyable?

Here’s the full implementation concept if you're curious: Gist 
Link.

Looking forward to your thoughts!

Best regards,