Porting std.typecons to Phobos 3

[Adam Wilson]

On Sunday, 17 November 2024 at 12:51:44 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> Is there any place where interested parties can check on the 
> current state of Phobos 3 development, and find out which 
> modules/types are in-progress vs. up for grabs? If not, it 
> might be a good idea to create one--maybe a Github projects 
> page, like the one in [this recent announcement][1].
>
> [1]: 
> https://forum.dlang.org/thread/pzrsrbwcdnysdgbyjijq@forum.dlang.org

Not at the moment. I've asked Razvan to create a project on the 
DLF Projects page that I can manage (and get all the state info 
out of my head), but I don't have the access myself.

> Built-in tuples for Phobos 3 would be awesome! If they support 
> named fields, then there's definitely no reason to keep Phobos 
> `Tuple` around IMO. If not, there might be room in Phobos 3 for 
> a `NamedTuple` type (a la Python).

I don't know if Timon's tuple's have names, but if they don't 
we'll have to do a `NamedTuple`.