Why isn’t 2.110 published?

[Ivan Kazmenko]

On Tuesday, 19 November 2024 at 17:57:37 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> I am not deeply concerned. I'm actually pretty positive on the 
> outlook.
>
> <snip: a long but much needed log of what works>

Thank you for spelling it out.

Reading the forum posts, it's easy to get a feeling that everyone 
is complaining.
So, it's good to see some people vocal about being happy with the 
language.
Perhaps naturally, when one doesn't have a complaint,
they don't have a good reason to discuss it either.

I'm using D for the past decade, in most of my programming where 
I have a choice.
As a recent example, in a competitive programming contest 
dedicated to a relatively new problem format 
(https://contest.ucup.ac/contest/1465), all the internal stuff 
(solutions, test generators, checking programs, etc) is written 
in D.

It's not perfect, but it's Good Enough, and I'm thankful for this 
tool to everyone involved.

Ivan Kazmenko.