Move Constructor Syntax

[Paul Backus]

On Monday, 7 October 2024 at 18:56:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> The current state of things strongly implies that copy 
> constructors were implemented and tested only in fairly simple 
> situations. They're just too much of a mess in practice.

The copy constructor proposal, DIP 1018, was fast-tracked through 
the DIP process "in the interest of releasing the implementation 
as soon as possible." [1] The result speaks for itself, I think.

[1] 
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1018.md#formal-assessment