Move Constructor Syntax

[claptrap]

On Wednesday, 9 October 2024 at 09:17:04 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
>
> Also, I agree with Jonathan and Paul that any discussion 
> regarding the syntax of the move constructor should also 
> include the copy constructor since we want to have consistent 
> syntax across special functions. We don't want to have:
>
> ```d
> struct S
> {
>     this(ref S s);   // copy constructor
>     =this(S s);      // move constructor
>       ... or ...
>      this.move;
> }
> ```
>
> Regards,
> RazvanN

thisMove, thisCopy,

same rationale as opEquals, etc...