Move Constructor Syntax

[Walter Bright]

On 10/9/2024 3:52 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> In fact any solution not using the written word 'move' or 'copy' does not have 
> intuitive syntax. I don't understand why anyone is trying to argue that using a 
> sigil in a novel way is intuitive.

We have special syntax already for constructors, postblits and destructors. None 
of it is intuitive - we're just used to it.