Why isn’t 2.110 published?

[jmh530]

On Friday, 25 October 2024 at 12:59:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 25 October 2024 at 12:48:02 UTC, Lance Bachmeier 
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> That's not the problem. A delay of three months (or however 
>> long it turns out to be) with no communication is not 
>> something you see when an open source project is healthy. It's 
>> a sign that all the contributors are focused on doing their 
>> own thing. Which of course they have a right to do, but then 
>> new users/adoption dries up. This combined with the death of 
>> GtkD and Visual D, and what appears to be a lack of new users, 
>> particularly business users, does not make a compelling case 
>> when comparing with other languages.
>
> One of Iain's goals is to get the release progress packaged up 
> into basically a single button push so that anyone can do it. 
> Once he gets to that point, we'll be able to avoid situations 
> like this. But we aren't there yet. Until we are, it's pretty 
> much on his shoulders.

I think that's a great goal, but I think Bachmeier's point is 
more about the lack of communication to the community. I don't 
think anyone is going to beat up on Iain for being busy and 
needing to delay the release a few weeks, but a heads up that the 
release is delayed makes the organization look a little more 
professional.