VisualD regressions are severe; what do we do about critical infrastructure?

[Adam Wilson]

On Sunday, 27 October 2024 at 01:25:58 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
>
> If I translated my "weak" concept to the official style guide 
> and added giant wall of text "documenting" it(being verbose and 
> unclear via overt unnecessary formality to match phoboes style) 
> would odds of success would you expect?

If you convert them into mergeable PR's, and if you are willing 
address change requests, and if you are willing to add the 
necessary documentation, then I don't see why merging them would 
be a problem.

And dropping the passive aggressive snark would definitely help 
your odds.