DIP1000 observation

[Sebastiaan Koppe]

On Tuesday, 3 September 2024 at 03:03:51 UTC, Richard (Rikki) 
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> On 03/09/2024 6:26 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
>> On Monday, 2 September 2024 at 13:15:51 UTC, Richard (Rikki) 
>> Andrew Cattermole wrote:
>>> The core issue with using DIP1000 is that it is not trying to 
>>> solve escape analysis or owner escape analysis for heap 
>>> memory. It is being misused to try to model heap memory.
>> 
>> Don't forget there are people using it as intended :)
>
> Thanks to your comment I realized that DIP1000's attributes and 
> my proposal's could live side by side during transition period.
>
> And yes, there absolutely should be a transition period. No way 
> I want to hurt anyone doing just that!
>
> It would be great if you would comment on my proposal, my 
> suspicion is at least for things that are not virtual, it 
> should "just work" for you.

Been swamped and didn't want to do a shallow one. Your coroutines 
one is still in the queue as well.