Grammar question. TypeSuffix - what is [ AssignExpression .. AssignExpression ] production for?

[user1234]

On Thursday, 5 September 2024 at 19:32:52 UTC, Nick Treleaven 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 5 September 2024 at 14:22:56 UTC, Quirin Schroll 
> wrote:
>> In fact, it was me who named it TypeSuffix; before, it was 
>> BasicType2X
>
> Thanks!
>
>> StaticArray:
>>     [ AssignExpression ]
>
> A type sequence can be indexed, so calling it StaticArray would 
> be confusing.
>

That does not matter. What matters is how the construct is 
initially parsed then in the specs you define "if the StaticArray 
sub-type resolves to a  sequence then ... ". But then you also 
have to define types like exposed in 
https://forum.dlang.org/post/kabzzfxlwgyzoidpxcbe@forum.dlang.org, i.e drop the suffix idea and in favor of the recursive descent style.