Order of evaluation for named arguments

[Dennis]

On Thursday, 3 April 2025 at 17:08:57 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Those are all language warts.

That's a fair position, but it changes some key facts.

This is no longer about an accident in the implementation of the 
recently added named arguments being codified in the spec. 
Instead, it's cementing a de-facto standard from since the 
beginning of dmd. A bad standard, but it's not trivial to revert 
it everywhere. Given that we all seem to agree that argument 
evaluation order is more about convenience than being a key 
ingredient for correct programs, that should help you understand 
Walter's decision making.