BindBC codegen survey
Jordan Wilson
wilsonjord at gmail.com
Sat Aug 23 20:53:47 UTC 2025
On Saturday, 23 August 2025 at 15:35:30 UTC, IchorDev wrote:
> Dear BindBC users,
>
> I am conducting an informal survey on the forums here to gauge
> the impact of the project's wide adoption of automatic
> code-generation via string mixins over the past 4 years.
>
> If you depend on one or more BindBC libraries in your project,
> then I would love if you could fill out your answers to the
> following questions, particularly noting which specific
> libraries affected your answers & when you had this experience.
> Your answers will help inform what direction I take for the
> future of the BindBC project's code.
>
> 1. What BindBC libraries do your projects depend on, and to
> what extent do you rely on them?
>
> 2. Have you ever experienced any usability issues caused by the
> automatic code-generation in a BindBC library?
>
> 3. Have you ever found that a BindBC library took a long time
> to compile?
1. bindbc-allegro5, and bindbc-physfs
2. Haven't noticed any issues. Hmmm maybe optional parentheses
don't appear to be optionally anymore? I noticed this going from
`SiegeLord/DAllegro5` to `bindbc-allegro5`.
3. No
Not sure if this is helpful at all, but anyway...
Jordan
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list