hacks on opApply
monkyyy
crazymonkyyy at gmail.com
Thu Aug 28 01:58:00 UTC 2025
On Thursday, 28 August 2025 at 00:49:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
>
> How you loop is defined by you. So calling the delegate in
> different ways is OK, but continuing on a non-zero value is not
> valid.
should vs could
The pattern seems to be 1 is a standard break, 2 and greater
incrementing by 1 other labels in reverse order. I expect 0, 1 vs
>1 could be justified, maybe the compiler does`[offset-result]`
list of address pointers and outside, *hostile*, changes I think
this will survive and maybe could've been in the compiler the
entire time.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list