D isn't the only language with janky closure semantics

[monkyyy]

On Saturday, 30 August 2025 at 18:43:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 05:20:18PM +0000, Konstantin via 
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> Why are delegates in D an aggregate of a context pointer and a
>> function pointer, not like C++'s lambdas (anonymous class with
>> `operator()`)?
>
> That's just an implementation issue.  I think the original 
> intention is to unify them with class member function pointers, 
> or something like that.
>
>
> T

Is it not a #wontfix?