Editions Ideas

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 25/12/2025 4:51 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 12/25/25 02:25, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
>> On 25/12/2025 1:04 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 24 December 2025 at 18:10:52 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, 24 December 2025 at 15:29:18 UTC, Kapendev wrote:
>>>> What I'd specifically like to do with `@property`, but note that I 
>>>> have tried and failed to implement it twice over the years, so don't 
>>>> hold your breath, is, in order of priority:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Your list looks good; one thing I'd add is that if you have 
>>> `@property ref int foo()` then `&foo` should get you an `int*`.
>>
>> Please do an ideas thread on what is wanted.
>>
>> As of right now, what I consider "fixing @property" to mean is removal.
>>
> 
> That would clearly be referred to as "removing @property", so you are 
> misunderstanding what was said.

I didn't misunderstand it.

What one person consider fixing @property isn't the same thing as what 
others think fixing @property is.

Hence me asking for an ideas thread to make it all explicit what is 
being intended here.