RFC: Change what assert does on error

Adam Wilson flyboynw at gmail.com
Thu Jul 3 07:36:23 UTC 2025


On Thursday, 3 July 2025 at 07:21:09 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
> This argument is, in practice, a Slippery Slope fallacy and 
> thus can be dismissed without further consideration.

Ok, technically it's a Reification fallacy with an implied 
Slippery Slope.

Still, it's not an argument of logic or reason.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list