RFC: Change what assert does on error

[Walter Bright]

On 7/3/2025 12:21 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
> It is an absolute non-negotiable business requirement that I be able to get 
> debugging information out of the server without physical access to the device. 
> If you won't deliver the logging data, corrupted or not, on an assert, then no 
> business can justify using D in production.

I did mention that logging the error before terminating the process was 
acceptable. My point is that recovering is not acceptable.