[OT] Senders and Receivers
Paul Backus
snarwin at gmail.com
Tue Jun 3 06:06:24 UTC 2025
On Monday, 2 June 2025 at 19:32:03 UTC, Derek Fawcus wrote:
>
> Why should "Structured Concurrency" be viewed as a better
> approach than CSP (or Actors for that matter)?
Here's the most popular explanation:
https://vorpus.org/blog/notes-on-structured-concurrency-or-go-statement-considered-harmful/
The main thesis (quoted from the article's conclusion) is this:
> These [unstructured concurrency] primitives are dangerous even
> if we don't use them directly, because they undermine our
> ability to reason about control flow and compose complex
> systems out of abstract modular parts, and they interfere with
> useful language features like automatic resource cleanup and
> error propagation.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list